cullypants
New member
Catalogs Hide
- 1 Specs
- 2 Which to get
When it comes to projectors, the battle between cutting-edge technology and practicality often takes center stage. On one hand, we have the LG CineBeam Ultra Short Throw Projector, boasting a stunning 4K UHD resolution and the ability to transform your living room into a cinematic experience with a massive 120-inch screen—all from just 7.2 inches away from the wall. With 20,000 hours of lamp life and 2,700 ANSI lumens brightness, it promises a vibrant display that stands up to ambient light.
On the other, we have the Mitsubishi XD365-EST, which comes in with a more traditional approach. While its native resolution of 1024 x 768 may not turn heads in the same way, it offers a respectable brightness of 2500 ANSI lumens and a solid contrast ratio of 3000:1. This projector may appeal to those looking for a cost-effective solution that still delivers decent performance for presentations or casual movie nights.
So, which projector truly reigns supreme? Is the LG's high resolution and ultra-short throw worth the investment, or does Mitsubishi's simplicity and reliability have its own merits? Let’s dive in and explore the features that could make or break your choice between these two distinct options.
First up, we have the LG CineBeam Ultra Short Throw Projector. It's rocking a stunning 4K UHD resolution, which is a huge plus for picture quality. Plus, the ultra short throw feature means I can get a massive 120" screen just a few inches from my wall. The lamp life is impressive too, lasting 20,000 hours, and with 2,700 ANSI Lumens, it should be bright enough for most settings. But, I wonder how the sound quality holds up—does it come with decent built-in speakers or would I need to invest in a sound system? Any downsides I should be aware of?
On the flip side, there's the Mitsubishi XD365-EST Projector. The resolution is a bit lower at 1024 x 768, but it’s still decent for basic needs, and it has a solid contrast ratio of 3000:1. It’s also slightly brighter at 2500 ANSI Lumens. However, I’m concerned about future-proofing it with that resolution and how it stacks up in terms of picture clarity compared to the LG. The sound quality is another question mark here—how does it compare?
So, what do you think? Is the LG worth the extra bucks for the 4K experience and ultra short throw, or could the Mitsubishi hold its own for a more budget-friendly option? I’d love to hear your thoughts on picture and sound quality, system features, and any potential downsides!
On the other, we have the Mitsubishi XD365-EST, which comes in with a more traditional approach. While its native resolution of 1024 x 768 may not turn heads in the same way, it offers a respectable brightness of 2500 ANSI lumens and a solid contrast ratio of 3000:1. This projector may appeal to those looking for a cost-effective solution that still delivers decent performance for presentations or casual movie nights.
So, which projector truly reigns supreme? Is the LG's high resolution and ultra-short throw worth the investment, or does Mitsubishi's simplicity and reliability have its own merits? Let’s dive in and explore the features that could make or break your choice between these two distinct options.
Specs
| Parameter | LG CineBeam Ultra Short Throw Projector | Mitsubishi XD365-EST Projector |
|---|---|---|
Picture |  |  |
Reference Price | $2598.99 | $963.36 |
Recommended Uses | home theaters, gaming, professional presentations | - |
Built-In Media | USB cable | - |
Highlight | 4K UHD Resolution (3840 x 2160) Ultra Short Throw ( up to 120" screen at 7.2" placement from wall) 20,000 Hrs. Lamp Life, 2,700 ANSI Lumens Brightness | Native Resolution:1024 x 768 and Maximum Resolution:1600 x 1200 Brightness/Lumens:2500 ANSI Lumens Contrast Ratio:3000:1 (On/Off) |
Screen Size | - | N/A - 150 Inches |
Contrast Ratio | - | 3000:1 |
Maximum Resolution | 3840 x 2160 | 1600 x 1200 |
Native Resolution | 3840 x 2160 | 1024 x 768 |
Display Type | DLP | DLP |
Other Features | Ultra Short Throw | short_throw, speakers, 3d-ready |
Video Encoding | H.264 or H.265 | - |
Lamp Wattage | - | 230 Watts |
LightSource Life | 20000 Hours | - |
Controller Type | Button Control | Button Control |
Control Method | Remote | - |
Connectivity Technology | USB, HDMI | HDMI |
Wattage | - | 340 watts |
Mount Type | Wall Mount | Tabletop Mount |
Which to get
I'm torn between these two projectors and could use some advice on which one would be the better investment.First up, we have the LG CineBeam Ultra Short Throw Projector. It's rocking a stunning 4K UHD resolution, which is a huge plus for picture quality. Plus, the ultra short throw feature means I can get a massive 120" screen just a few inches from my wall. The lamp life is impressive too, lasting 20,000 hours, and with 2,700 ANSI Lumens, it should be bright enough for most settings. But, I wonder how the sound quality holds up—does it come with decent built-in speakers or would I need to invest in a sound system? Any downsides I should be aware of?
On the flip side, there's the Mitsubishi XD365-EST Projector. The resolution is a bit lower at 1024 x 768, but it’s still decent for basic needs, and it has a solid contrast ratio of 3000:1. It’s also slightly brighter at 2500 ANSI Lumens. However, I’m concerned about future-proofing it with that resolution and how it stacks up in terms of picture clarity compared to the LG. The sound quality is another question mark here—how does it compare?
So, what do you think? Is the LG worth the extra bucks for the 4K experience and ultra short throw, or could the Mitsubishi hold its own for a more budget-friendly option? I’d love to hear your thoughts on picture and sound quality, system features, and any potential downsides!
